How Safe and Innovative Are First-in-Class Drugs Approved by Health Canada: A Cohort Study
نویسنده
چکیده
INTRODUCTION First-in-class drugs use a unique mechanism of action. This study assessed the therapeutic innovativeness and safety of these drugs approved by Health Canada from 1997-2012. METHODS A list of new drugs was compiled and a database from the Food and Drug Administration was used to determine first-in-class status. Post-market safety warnings and drugs withdrawn for safety reasons were identified from the MedEffect Canada website. Therapeutic innovation evaluations came from the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) and Prescrire International. The proportion of first-in-class drugs that were innovative was compared to the proportion of non-first-in-class drugs that were innovative. Kaplan-Meier survival curves assessed safety. RESULTS In all, 462 drugs were approved by Health Canada during the period under study. Among these, 345 were evaluated by PMPRB and/or Prescrire, and first-in-class data were available for 292. Ninety-eight of the 292 were first-in-class and 16 were innovative compared to 9 of 194 drugs that were not-first-in-class. There was no difference in safety between the two groups. DISCUSSION Overall, the benefit-to-harm ratio of first-in-class drugs, as measured by post-market safety warnings/withdrawals, is better than those that were not-first-in-class.
منابع مشابه
Universal Pharmacare in Canada: A Prescription for Equity in Healthcare
Despite progressive universal drug coverage and pharmaceutical policies found in other countries, Canada remains the only developed nation with a publicly funded healthcare system that does not include universal coverage for prescription drugs. In the absence of a national pharmacare plan, a province may choose to cover a specific sub-population for certain drugs. Altho...
متن کاملAssessing the potential clinical impact of reciprocal drug approval legislation on access to novel therapeutics in the USA: a cohort study
OBJECTIVE To quantify the potential effect of reciprocal approval legislation on access to clinically impactful therapeutics in the USA. DESIGN A cohort study. SETTING New therapeutics approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA) and/or Health Canada between 2000 and 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Characteristics of new therapeutics approved by the EMA ...
متن کاملIt Won’t Be Easy: How to Make Universal Pharmacare Work in Canada
One of the glaring gaps in Canada’s universal healthcare system is the low level of public financing of prescription drugs - 42.7% of total spending in 2018. At the federal level there is renewed interest in moving towards universal coverage, supported by a recently commissioned report on how to achieve it. It will take superb political navigation to extract Canadian ph...
متن کاملTrends in utilization of FDA expedited drug development and approval programs, 1987-2014: cohort study
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the use of special expedited development and review pathways at the US Food and Drug Administration over the past two decades. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING FDA approved novel therapeutics between 1987 and 2014. POPULATION Publicly available sources provided each drug's year of approval, their innovativeness (first in class versus not first in class), World Health Org...
متن کاملCorrection. Health Canada's use of its priority review process for new drugs: a cohort study.
OBJECTIVES Priority reviews of new drug applications are resource intensive and drugs approved through this process have a greater likelihood of acquiring a serious safety warning compared to drugs approved through the standard process. Therefore, when Health Canada uses priority reviews, it is important that it accurately identifies products that represent a significant therapeutic advance. Th...
متن کامل